Skip to content

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC)

Type: University (Academia) Location: Urbana, Illinois SST projects: 3 Key labs: Coordinated Science Lab (Kamalabadi), Electric Propulsion Lab (Rovey) Last updated: Session 17, 2026-04-14


SST Portfolio

Project PI Period TRL Outcome
95523 Milli-Arcsecond Imaging Farzad Kamalabadi 2018–2022 3→6 transitioned → VISORS (NSF $4.4M)
106816 Chemical-Electrospray MEPS Joshua Rovey 2020–2025 3→3 no-visible-outcome (TRL stall)
91380 Integrated Power + Thermal Alexander Ghosh 2015–2017 3→5 no-visible-outcome

Hit rate: 1 of 3 (33%) — below portfolio average. But that one outcome (VISORS) is among the highest-impact SST transitions in the portfolio.


Principal Investigators

Farzad Kamalabadi — Milli-Arcsecond Imaging (95523)

Kamalabadi is the Kung Chie and Margaret Yeh Endowed Professor in ECE at UIUC. His SST project developed super-resolution imaging techniques using formation-flying smallsats as a distributed telescope, achieving TRL 6.

This SST project produced the single largest follow-on NSF award in the portfolio:

VISORS (Virtual Super-Resolution Optics with Reconfigurable Swarms) — $4.4M NSF CubeSat Ideas Lab award (NSF #1936663). Two 6U CubeSats forming a distributed telescope with 40-meter focal length to image the solar corona at milli-arcsecond resolution in extreme ultraviolet. Planned to launch in 2026.

VISORS is the SST convergence nexus. The mission involves 10+ universities and draws on 4+ SST people chains: - Kamalabadi (UIUC) — PI, imaging concept from SST [95523] - D'Amico (Stanford) — formation flying GN&C from SST [95519] and [94049] - Lightsey (GA Tech SSDL) — spacecraft design from SST-adjacent JSC/Lunar Flashlight heritage - Montana State — RadSat radiation tolerance from SST [94020] (GSFC) - Purdue — thermal management heritage - CU Boulder — communications systems

See VISORS convergence surprise for the full analysis.

The SST→VISORS link is the cleanest example of SST seed → major follow-on mission in the university portfolio. TechPort even includes the NSF award link directly in the project's library items.

Confidence: SST→VISORS transition confirmed (TechPort library items include NSF award link). $4.4M confirmed (UIUC press release, NSF award page). Multi-university team confirmed (NSF, UIUC CSL). Launch date 2026: suggestive (no specific date confirmed, mission still in development as of April 2026).

Joshua Rovey — Chemical-Electrospray MEPS (106816)

Rovey directs UIUC's Electric Propulsion Lab. His SST cooperative agreement developed MEPS (Monopropellant-Electrospray Propulsion System) — a dual-mode thruster that uses FAM-110A propellant in both chemical combustion mode (high thrust) and capillary electrospray mode (high Isp). The concept is strikingly similar to GPDM (155369), which uses ASCENT propellant in chemical + electrospray modes.

TRL stall: 5-year project (2020–2025) ended at TRL 3 — the same level it started. This suggests the MEPS concept did not advance past laboratory bench testing. Contrast with GPDM, which achieved an actual flight build.

Why MEPS stalled while GPDM succeeded: - GPDM drew on Archetype #13 (Multi-Program SBIR Convergence): multiple mature SBIR pipelines (Rubicon ASCENT thrusters, Espace electronics, MIT SPL electrospray) converging on a single demo. - MEPS was a single university lab developing everything in-house. No commercial hardware suppliers. No pre-existing SBIR pipeline feeding components. - GPDM used ASCENT (AF-M315E), which has extensive flight heritage from Lunar Flashlight and Green Propellant Infusion Mission (GPIM). MEPS used FAM-110A, a newer propellant with less heritage.

Publications: Rovey published multiple AIAA papers on MEPS and multimode propulsion, including "Lunar SmallSat Missions with Chemical-Electrospray Multimode Propulsion" (J. Spacecraft & Rockets). Co-investigators included GSFC (Thomas Liu, Khary Parker) and Steven Berg. The academic output is solid even though the hardware didn't mature.

Confidence: TRL stall confirmed (TechPort: 3→3). MEPS concept confirmed (AIAA publications, NTRS presentation 20220006559). Comparison to GPDM: suggestive (same dual-mode concept, different propellant and maturation path).

Alexander Ghosh — Integrated Power + Thermal (91380)

Ghosh developed an integrated power generation and energy storage system using carbon fiber solar panels with microvascular fluid channels for active thermal management. TRL 3→5 over 2 years (2015–2017). Early-era project.

Downstream: No visible follow-on found. The microvascular thermal management concept is innovative but niche. No publications found in NTRS or major journals. Typical of the academic TRL ceiling — an interesting concept that reached lab demonstration but had no path to flight or commercialization.

Confidence: No-visible-outcome confirmed (no follow-on found in TechPort, NTRS, or web search).


Cross-References

  • VISORS convergencesurprise (Kamalabadi origin)
  • Stanfordorg page (D'Amico on VISORS GN&C)
  • GPDM / Marshallorg page (MEPS vs GPDM comparison)
  • Smallsat Propulsiontopic (MEPS in dual-mode landscape)
  • University & Academic Outcomestopic
  • Thermal, Power, Sensorstopic (Ghosh thermal)

Patterns

UIUC demonstrates extreme outcome variance: one project produced the portfolio's largest NSF follow-on ($4.4M VISORS), while the other two had no visible downstream. This fits the university "one big hit" pattern — academic SST success is PI-dependent, not institutional.

The Rovey/MEPS case is instructive as a contrast to GPDM: same dual-mode propulsion concept, but GPDM succeeded through multi-program SBIR convergence (Archetype #13) while MEPS attempted the university-only path and stalled. This reinforces that flight demonstrations need mature commercial supply chains, not just good science.


Confidence summary: - Kamalabadi → VISORS: confirmed (TechPort, NSF, UIUC press) - Rovey MEPS TRL stall: confirmed (TechPort) - Ghosh no-outcome: confirmed (no follow-on found) - MEPS vs GPDM comparison: suggestive (inferred from parallel development, different outcomes)